First Lady? Shoot, if it was up to her there wouldn’t be an America to begin with.

It’s about time an ad exposes the true Obama, a leftist terrorist:

Americas will be destroyed the second this guy takes office. These guys don’t believe in anything except anarchy and marxism.

Bad news for conservatives:

White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That’s eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004.

The nation has been growing more diverse for decades, but the process has sped up through immigration and higher birth rates among minority residents, especially Hispanics.

It is also growing older.

“The white population is older and very much centered around the aging baby boomers who are well past their high fertility years,” said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. “The future of America is epitomized by the young people today. They are basically the melting pot we are going to see in the future.”

By 2050, whites will make up 46 percent of the population and blacks will make up 15 percent, a relatively small increase from today. Hispanics, who make up about 15 percent of the population today, will account for 30 percent in 2050, according to the new projections.

Asians, which make up about 5 percent of the population, are projected to increase to 9 percent by 2050.

I’m a color blind person, but these are bad demographics for conservatives. Blacks are as anti-conservative as they come, and hispanics vote heavily democratic, too. I’m not a math whiz, but if Bush won in 2000 and 2004 by slim margins, those margins will be long gone in the future. There are only 2 ways out of this. White americans have to have more babies or we have to convince hispanics and blacks to be conservative. Seeing as how that hasn’t worked up until now, I think whites have to start procreating or else conservatism in the US could die.

Lieberman tells it like it is:

One of the McCain campaign’s new themes, that Senator John McCain has always put his country first, has been seen by some analysts as a subtle suggestion that his opponent, Senator Barack Obama, has not.

But as he introduced Mr. McCain at a campaign event here on Tuesday, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut made the attack a lot more explicit, calling the election a choice “between one candidate, John McCain, who has always put the country first, worked across party lines to get things done, and one candidate who has not.’’

Mr. Lieberman, the Connecticut Independent who was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2000, made the remark as he used his introduction of Mr. McCain to deliver a harsh assessment of Mr. Obama without mentioning his name.

“In my opinion, the choice could not be more clear: between one candidate, John McCain, who’s had experience, been tested in war and tried in peace, another candidate who has not,’’ Mr. Lieberman said. “Between one candidate, John McCain, who has always put the country first, worked across party lines to get things done, and one candidate who has not. Between one candidate who’s a talker, and the other candidate who’s the leader America needs as our next president.”

I can’t even believe people are considering Barry Soetoro to lead this great country. With BARRY, it’s himself first. Or cocaine first. But not country. He’d probably sign away the United States to Russia and bin Laden if they promised to give us socialized medicine.

Bill Kristol:

Georgia, a nation of about 4.6 million, has had the third-largest military presence — about 2,000 troops — fighting along with U.S. soldiers and marines in Iraq. For this reason alone, we owe Georgia a serious effort to defend its sovereignty. Surely we cannot simply stand by as an autocratic aggressor gobbles up part of — and perhaps destabilizes all of — a friendly democratic nation that we were sponsoring for NATO membership a few months ago.

For that matter, consider the implications of our turning away from Georgia for other aspiring pro-Western governments in the neighborhood, like Ukraine’s. Shouldn’t we therefore now insist that normal relations with Russia are impossible as long as the aggression continues, strongly reiterate our commitment to the territorial integrity of Georgia and Ukraine, and offer emergency military aid to Georgia?

Incidentally, has Russia really been helping much on Iran? It has gone along with — while delaying — three United Nations Security Council resolutions that have imposed mild sanctions on Iran. But it has also supplied material for Iran’s nuclear program, and is now selling Iran antiaircraft systems to protect military and nuclear installations.

It’s striking that dictatorial and aggressive and fanatical regimes — whatever their differences — seem happy to work together to weaken the influence of the United States and its democratic allies. So Russia helps Iran. Iran and North Korea help Syria. Russia and China block Security Council sanctions against Zimbabwe. China props up the regimes in Burma and North Korea.

The United States, of course, is not without resources and allies to deal with these problems and threats. But at times we seem oddly timid and uncertain.

When the “civilized world” expostulated with Russia about Georgia in 1924, the Soviet regime was still weak. In Germany, Hitler was in jail. Only 16 years later, Britain stood virtually alone against a Nazi-Soviet axis. Is it not true today, as it was in the 1920s and ’30s, that delay and irresolution on the part of the democracies simply invite future threats and graver dangers?

Seems to me that we are backing away from our ally and more importantly backing down from the Soviets. They want to recreate the Soviet Union, and we’re going to have to face them down sooner or later. We might as well defend freedom and fight them now.

America’s Most Vain Communist, John Edwards, showed that along with there being two americas, he has two lives. While he claimed to be working for the little guy, he was working for his own little guy. If this is how he treats his sick wife, how do you think he would have treated us if he won the Presidency?

Pam Meister asks us:

It’s worse than you think: George W. Bush will be leaving office in mid-January 2009, leaving professional Bush-bashers up the proverbial creek without a paddle. Once Bush is no longer in office and, one presumes, enjoying his retirement on his ranch in Crawford, Texas, who will Americans blame for all the ills known to plague modern man?

The few days of national unity against an evil force that seeks to destroy America after 9/11 notwithstanding, President Bush has been blamed for just about every problem known to plague humanity. Not only is he responsible for the fact that Europeans think we’re just a bunch of boorish cowboys who don’t know a salad fork from a demitasse spoon — yes, I know they’ve always thought that, but it’s worse now, right? — but he’s also responsible for:

• 9/11 (if you don’t believe it was an inside job, just ask Rosie O’Donnell)

• the mess in New Orleans and the surrounding area after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 (conveniently letting state and city government bumblers off the hook)

• global warming because he wouldn’t sign the Kyoto Protocol (even though Congress gave it thumbs down during Bill Clinton’s administration and Clinton decided to leave well enough alone)

• the tsunami in Indonesia in 2004 (see above reason)

• weight and relationship problems of average citizens whom he’s never even met

I could go on, but my space is limited.

I know exactly what Pam is saying. All we hear about is how bad George Bush is. But why can’t the liberal media and liberals offer solutions? No, it’s just complaints. If they have a solution it is Communism. And they won’t shut up unless we accept their vision of Communism. I say, hell no! That’s un-American. So when the Communists start talking about Bush this, Bush that, let’s just give them a big F U.

–Jerry

Then I’m all for it. The simple reason is that Obama thinks he’s better than you or I. That alone is reason to make sure he will not get the power of the Presidency. John McCain is not perfect, but he didn’t crack to the Communists. Meanwhile, Obama is one.

The Olympics start today and unless the Chinese don’t spy on our athletes, America will be #1 again! Let’s cheer on our great athletes!

I’m telling you folks if Obama is elected, we’ll have the worst President of all time. He wants to remake all our cherished values. He wants us to become a cult of followers like him. More evidence is of this here:

Sign of Progress–yeah, progress to a communist state. I’m just surprised the background is blue and not red.

So this is what we’re going to get folks. Instead of saluting the flag before a sporting event or other solemn event, we will be saluting our Dear Leader Obama.

Michelle Malkin has other Obama gestures.